首页> 外文OA文献 >Legal Patterns of Global Governance: Participatory Transnational Governance
【2h】

Legal Patterns of Global Governance: Participatory Transnational Governance

机译:全球治理的法律模式:参与性跨国治理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multilevel trade governance and transnational social regulation put democratic self-regulation under stress. A growing number of supra- and transnational norms, rules, and regulations on trade, environmental issues, or any other field of regulation, prove that we are facing another great transformation, the transformation of international relations and intergovernmental politics into law-generating fora, with government and private networks and a number of court-like institutions as central actors. This process of transnational juridification limits parliamentary rooms for manoeuvre and comprehensively alienates many citizens submitted to transnational regulation from this process. This contribution attempts to clarify the mechanisms at work. In a second step it seeks to identify possible concepts that could grasp this transformation, and confronts them again with the problem of self-government. In a bow to the particularities of the transnational sphere, it tries to resist the methodological nation-state trap. Instead, it supports a constitutionalization of participative structures in global administrative governance. The outline, degree, and limits of such a concept are not self-explaining. The EU and its attempts to integrate civic participation, thus, may illustrate concrete outlines of such a project. This reconstruction allows for concluding observations on global structures and the constitutionalization of participatory transnational governance on a global scale.
机译:多层次贸易治理和跨国社会监管使民主自我监管受到压力。越来越多的关于贸易,环境问题或任何其他监管领域的超国家和跨国规范,规则和规定证明,我们正面临着另一项重大转变,即将国际关系和政府间政治转变为产生法律的论坛,与政府和私人网络以及许多类似法院的机构一起充当中心角色。跨国司法化的过程限制了议会的回旋余地,并全面疏远了许多接受跨国监管的公民。该贡献试图阐明工作机制。在第二步中,它试图确定可能掌握这一转变的可能概念,并再次将其与自治问题面对。为了对付跨国领域的特殊性,它试图抵制方法论上的民族国家陷阱。相反,它支持全球行政治理中参与结构的宪法化。这样的概念的轮廓,程度和限制不是很容易理解。因此,欧盟及其整合公民参与的尝试可以说明该项目的具体轮廓。这种重建可以得出关于全球结构的结论性意见,并在全球范围内将参与性跨国治理制度化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nickel, Rainer;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号